|
|
On Seethruart's web gallery http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery/view?username=seethruart
Look Under Apollo Anomalies Gallery
The comments for the "Photo Comparison" is what I'm focusing on for this rebuttal.
He makes the statement -
"While you are studying the original of this comparison image, pay close attention the small area between the back of the astronaut's helmet and his backpack. There is ANOTHER DISH/ANTENNA there(of a different type) and it clearly doesn't belong to the rover. I wonder how it got there and what it's doing in an Apollo moon photo? The Lunar rover has only ONE dish/antenna"
I added the bold to emphasize this statement is clearly false.
The upper part of the circled area
is what he is referring to.
The original image is located here
It seems to be about the right place for something that was on the rover. Let's check it out. In less than 5 minutes of searching in the Apollo 16 image gallery I found this picture of the rover.
The instrument with the arrow pointing
to it is clearly the object seethruart was referring to.
The original image is located here.
Although this picture shows the rover facing the opposite direction, you can plainly see the object above does indeed belong to the rover. It is the correct height, shape and place to be the object that seethruart claims clearly doesn't belong to the rover.
Clearly Seethruart does not take the slightest bit of time to investigate his own theories.
This might be the first in a line of rebuttals to Seethruart's claims. It depends on how bored I get.
Swamp_Gas
I see that I wasn't quite clear. I have rotated the second picture to a similar orientation as the first image shows the rover. You can see now where the dish is and the antenna thingy labeled B. are in relation to the supposed "second dish". I don't have any idea what the purpose of the contraption labeled A. is, but it is a part of the rover. And it is the thing you are seeing behind the astronauts head in the first picture. Remember that the second image is flipped, so in actuality you would be looking at figure A. from the other side in first picture.
Thanks to Skip for finding this next one showing the "second dish".
Although still at a different angle, you can see
the similiarity is obvious.
The original image is located here
End of story
Or is it? Click here for page 2
